At the pinnacle, slugging it out to this day amongst anachrophiles, were two rivals: the Switzerland's Thorens TD-124 and the UK contender, the Garrard 301. In the 1950s, reference- or broadcast-grade decks, referred to as 'transcription' turntables, were of idler or rim drive, with only minimal isolation afforded by the suspensions that might mean merely something as rudimentary as rubber 'mushrooms' or leaf springs. Which is not to say that there wasn't a hierarchy. But magical sonic properties were not attributed to the rotating portion of the equation. Stability was all, while addressing isolation was a given microphony, for example, is not a new problem. Oh, and it wouldn't hurt if the deck's motor was shielded so you could use cartridges from Decca. As for the turntable itself? If you read the writings of patriarchs Wilson, Watts and Kelly, you surmise that a deck need only to rotate perfectly at the designated speeds of 33 1/3, 45 or 78rpm, without wow, flutter, rumble or cogging effects. Stereo changed all of that: SME, Ortofon and others proved, after the advent of two-channel playback virtually quadrupled the demands on a cartridge, that it wasn't quite so base and straightforward a task. , all the arm had to do was allow the cartridge to traverse the disc with minimal tracking error, presenting it with a stable platform, e.g. The 'motor unit' and arm? Necessary only to rotate the disc and carry the pick-up. They thought that the cartridge was responsible for, oh, let's say 99 percent of the job of carrying the signal from groove to phono stage. Hi-fi 'how to' books and yearbooks gave tens of pages to cartridges (or 'heads' or 'pick-ups') but only two or three pages for the decks themselves. In the 1950s and 1960s, audio hobbyists didn't to turntables. See more about the audiophile world at.Find a receiver to pair with this source.Read more source component reviews from.It will only aggravate your ulcer because, if the amount of wordage given to what they quaintly used to refer to as 'motor units' is any indication, they didn't think too much of turntables back then. Under 65? A vinyl addict of the post- Linn persuasion? Then don't go poring over old hi-fi magazines, books or yearbooks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |